Why The Neutralist? The term Isolationist implies a narrow Fortress America outlook and is used as an epithet. The term Neutralist does not indicate someone hiding out from the world. No one calls the Swiss isolationists. The Wilsonian world view is old, tired and wrong. Our interventions have been less and less successful and now the failure can no longer be covered up.
Wicked Shockah, George Will does not like Putin. Yeah, like you're going to lose a gig for going after the Russian leader. Remember how he got Iraq right? No, he was goofy then, he is goofy now.
Anyway, linked below is my article on how silly the George Will WAPO column is. the man compares Mussolini and Putin. The comparison is ridiculous.
George Will speaks ex-cathedra at WAPO-Actually, he just mails it in.
In our substack, The Long Hill Institute, we have written a piece about how neutralist policy is being subtly and not so subtly shunted aside in Ireland.
Neutrality had served Ireland well. Her youth would not be cast up to and slaughtered in a war not their own in the 1940s.
Now, spurious arguments are being put forward why neutralism is passé.
We disagree.
The substack looks at a country not abandoning neutralism. Professor Pascal Lottaz writes about Austria, which was able to free itself from foreign powers via neutralism and is not throwing it over as Finland is.
There is also Pascal's YouTube interview with Prof. Dr. Heinz Gärtner about Austria and the value of credible neutralism.
Read:
Eric Zuesse has written an article that lists Ten Truths That Can’t Be Published Under The U.S. Regime.
The Neutralist tried to post it on Twitter and got this message:
“We can’t complete this request because this link has been identified by Twitter or our partners as being potentially harmful.”
Thus, they made the case for Mr. Zuesse.
As to where the Regime begins and Twitter ends, we leave to others to study.
We endorse the link.
