Iran’s Khamenei Says US Promises Have No Credibility
Read the article at antiwar.com
Why The Neutralist? The term Isolationist implies a narrow Fortress America outlook and is used as an epithet. The term Neutralist does not indicate someone hiding out from the world. No one calls the Swiss isolationists. The Wilsonian world view is old, tired and wrong. Our interventions have been less and less successful and now the failure can no longer be covered up.
Saying Putin has no soul and is a murderer is rich coming from a man who still supports the evil Saudi war in Yemen and continues the needless war in Syria.
Reading Max Abrahms on Twitter, I find out Putin challenged Biden to a debate. Can't happen, but would love to see it.
The Quincy Institute has an article, Calling Putin a ‘killer’ with ‘no soul’ is not exactly diplomatic finesse by Anatol Lieven. One might be tempted to say tell me something I don't know, but it is worth a read.
Chris Murphy is regarded as a progressive and that is so. There once was breed of the species known as Peace Democrats. They are in the main extinct as the Democrat Party is effectively a war party.
Surprisingly, however, The Senator's article of February 19, 2021, America’s Middle East Policy Is Outdated and Dangerous; A New Approach to the Gulf States Needs a Better Foundation is not a bad effort for a guy who has been a bit hawkish in other places.
He is calling for restraint and getting along with Iran and letting Yemen live. Whether or not it is so we can bug others is a question:
In pursuing this new course, some sky-will-fall adherents to the status quo will argue that if the Biden administration drives too hard a bargain, Gulf leaders will turn away from the United States and toward China or Russia. This argument is a red herring, one that plays on a misunderstanding of both the irreplaceability of military alignment with the United States and the willingness of China and Russia to get their hands dirty in Middle Eastern politics. This isn’t the Cold War: Russia has little to offer in the region, and as global oil usage continues to fall, Moscow will inevitably compete with Gulf countries for buyers. Although China will continue to look for economic opportunities in the region, it will be unwilling to play a real security role anytime in the near future. The Chinese navy isn’t going to come to the aid of a Gulf country under attack. If the Bahrainis, Emiratis, or Saudis threaten to turn to other powers, Washington can afford to call their bluff.
Ultimately, restraint is nice, but there is a question to ask, Why do we have to be there at all? Does any of this actually make life better for your average American citizen?
The Neutralist has been asking this question for decades now and no one on team war has come up with an answer.
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2021-02-19/americas-middle-east-policy-outdated-and-dangerous
Stephen Kinzer nails it in his February 18, 2021 Boston Globe column. He shouldn't have to, we should've been long gone from Afghanistan, but we aren't and if some foreign policy goofs have their way, we may never.
Worth a read anyway:
Saudi Arabia is a tyranny of vast proportions and yet it has love in certain American circles. If you asked your garden variety progressive if we should have ever had diplomatic relations with the German National Socialist regime, they would probably say no.
If you ask should we have them with Saudi Arabia, you would probably draw a blank. Over time, it can be argued the KSA regime is worse, but none of the cool kids are going to over-worry about it, just as Julian Assange is not a thing for them.
Doug Bandow is not asleep, however. He looks at the love that is being given to the kingdom:
The Revolving Door Project looks at the Center for a New American Security and pinpoints the sinecuristas that go in and out of the Washington revolving door.
Good Work RDP, but it should probably be filed under Plus ça change.
Hey, for all we know, CNAS might be a bunch of peaceniks, but it does smell a little war mongerish.
The board of directors seems the usual suspects.
Article from Yahoo News:
Buying gas from the Russkies makes sense rather than shipping it from the US, but beating the Russians is more important in Washington.
Now that the world's worst president has been replaced by the world's worst president, the pursuit of a whistleblower continues.
"Those "jihadists" seem even better equiped that the SAA...at least at uniforms level...TTG's reply:
(the commenter) wonders where all those new uniforms with the IS and HTS banners embroidened are produced....
On the other hand, to built such a network of trenches, tunnels, and bunkers, in that size and durability, provided even with electric light, is it not necessary to have knowledge of some engineering branches?
It does not seem possible to have them by some radicalized thugs at a mosque anywhere, but by a well funded, organized and trainned army...."
"those jihadists are well funded, organized and trained. Years at war does that to you. They also receive plenty of support from Gulf royals and Turkey. We and our allies have provided them with modern antitank and antiaircraft missiles. I wish they were just angry and frustrated men in a mosque. Unfortunately, many are quite intelligent and capable soldiers."