There is an industry of hostage negotiators and I've heard some interviewed and they sound a reasonable tribe. Through talking and empathizing with the hostage takers they save lives.
There is an alternative theory. The book, Getting to Yes apparently has not been read in Algeria. the rulers of that country fought the French and despite getting handled roughly, refused to admit defeat sufficiently that the Gauls ended up doing the admitting.
Not so long ago they fought and defeated Islamists in a bloody conflict. I know a little more than the average American about the Algeria and it's conflicts. That is to say, I know a tad north of zilch. What I do know is that these are a crew that don't roll over. US style Rodney Kingism is not their method.
So in the recent hostage event, the algerians were not interested in compromise. They were brutal and they won. I wonder if they were also sending a message to us like screw you and the Arab Spring bs.
I was pointed to this article by Malcolm Pollak. I know about as much about The American Interest as I do about Algeria. Still, it rings true and I recommend it. Mr. Garfinkle may not be a Neutralist, but the piece does not harm our beliefs.
Why The Neutralist? The term Isolationist implies a narrow Fortress America outlook and is used as an epithet. The term Neutralist does not indicate someone hiding out from the world. No one calls the Swiss isolationists. The Wilsonian world view is old, tired and wrong. Our interventions have been less and less successful and now the failure can no longer be covered up.
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Getting to Dead, Algeria shows the way
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment